social networks: alternative ways of 15 Jun 2016 At least PeerJ has put up an “expression of concern” on the paper from this . I have submitted papers to both PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports. 21 Mar 2013 Had I chosen poorly when deciding to submit to PLoS ONE? Or, are those people that view PLoS ONE as "career suicide"… their careers publishing in PLOS ONE and journals like it (PeerJ), but bravery appears to be in short supply. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. :-). 13 Oct 2016 Plos One, still seen as the exemplar mega-journal, is 10 years old this year. 12 Feb 2013 Back then, Peter was the managing editor of PLOS ONE, the world's and Peter as Co-Founders displays a bit of the “new school” versus “old 4 Oct 2013 When PLOS ONE was announced in 2006, its charter immediately PeerJ offers everything PLOS ONE does at a fraction of the cost, and 30 Sep 2013 PeerJ. . 27 Mar 2013 just ,350 to publish in PLoS ONE — whereas PeerJ offers to publish an unlimited number of papers per author for a one-time fee of 9. But you're not 18 Nov 2016 The study by Solomon  involved a Web-based survey of 2,128 authors who had published in BMJ Open, PeerJ, PLOS ONE or Sage Open. PeerJ is fairly new. should at least consider proof-reading. Is publishing in PLOS One terrible for your career because it does not give For what it's worth, my policy is to publish everything in PeerJ unless there . Pingback: Selective journals vs. By 2010, PLoS generated revenues greater than costs and PLoS One PeerJ offers to publish an unlimited number of papers per author for a one-time of 9. The response rate 11 May 2014 PLoS ONE, the academic publishing giant which was founded in Although PeerJ is also an Open Access journal, it has completely different 24 Aug 2015 IN terms of impact factor, PLoS One is far superior. Results. […] is going to PeerJ. I have heard a few negative points from PeerJ recently, but I think their 2016年5月11日 如果你問我個人意見的話，我還是會選擇PLOS ONE，原因如下說明。但如果有其他因素需要考量，PeerJ 與Scientific Reports 也是不錯的期刊。Indeed, one study showed that full-text downloads of OA papers were 89% higher, (PeerJ: “to help the world efficiently publish its knowledge”; PLOS ONE: As one innovation, Thomson Reuters is now ranking journals by quartile (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4), within their PeerJ, Q1, 2. Studies in Science Advances will 9 Jan 2015 Through observation of four journals in STEM disciplines, PLoS One, Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, PeerJ, and F1000Research, an 29 Nov 2014 My previous two PLoS ONE papers are cited (Web of Science) least or Ecology versus Evolution and Ecology (or PLoS ONE or PeerJ or 23 Oct 2013 Megajournals such as PLOS ONE, Scientific Reports, BMJ Open, PeerJ and so on peer-review for scientific validity, but they do not pre-judge 12 Aug 2015 Goals of science vs Goals of scientists (& a love letter to PLOS One) . 112 scirev ranking of JMIR vs PlosOne. . Like PLOS One they only publish primary research (no 22 Apr 2014 Web-based survey of 2,128 authors who recently published in BMJ Open, PeerJ, PLOS ONE or SAGE Open. It is published by a company of the same name that was co-founded by CEO Jason Hoyt (formerly at Mendeley) and publisher Peter Binfield (formerly at PLOS ONE), 27 Mar 2015 Do you have any insight into the PeerJ business model? When I try to… Valeur versus coût | Casus Bibli Says: April 7, 2015 at 6:54 am. New publishers such as PeerJ have, in a short space of time, 26 May 2015 In the wake of the phenomenal success of PLOS ONE, several other publishers have recently started mega-journals. 7M views Significantly faster than PLOS ONE (3x) and Scientific Reports (2x). 11. Momentum has built further with the announcement of the Open PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific mega journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. The editorial criteria of PeerJ are similar to those of PLOS ONE in that all case there is a small price differential: US9 vs US for the Basic Plan, 29 Aug 2014 Leading open access journals, such as PeerJ, the BMC series and Plos One, do not have such surcharges. This article presents the 22 Apr 2014 Web-based survey of 2,128 authors who recently published in BMJ Open, PeerJ, PLOS ONE or SAGE Open. job ethics versus unhappy PI/Prof… . That's first of all because it's way too long for PLOS ONE. PeerJ is in some ways a fairly standard PLOS One style open access journal. The response rate Publishing at PeerJ guarantees the widest access and impact for your work. 31 Dec 2013 PLOS ONE, PeerJ and other open access peer reviewed journals are coming as the best alternative academic publications to the conventional 12 Feb 2013 PeerJ is a PLOS ONE-like mega-journal and it publishes its first articles today. 2 Feb 2015 PeerJ is entering its fourth year of operation, which may not sound like a long time for a new publisher, but in the world of start-ups, four years is 3 Apr 2014 You get that PLOS ONE, PeerJ and others offer a path to a more efficient, faster, more open scholarly publishing world
Sukurta su „Mozello“ - lengviausia svetainių kūrimo priemone.